Perfiles de agresores sexuales que agreden a una desconocida

  1. Meritxell Pérez Ramírez
  2. Andrea Giménez-Salinas Framis
  3. JJosé Luis González Álvarez
  4. Juan Enrique Soto Castro
Revista:
Cuadernos de la Guardia Civil: Revista de seguridad pública

ISSN: 1136-4645

Año de publicación: 2020

Número: 60

Páginas: 105-125

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Cuadernos de la Guardia Civil: Revista de seguridad pública

Resumen

Las agresiones sexuales en las que no existe una relación previa entre agresor y víctima son las más difíciles de resolver para la policía. El presente artículo pretender identificar los perfiles de agresores sexuales que agreden a una desconocida para facilitar la investigación policial de este tipo de casos. Para ello, se ha analizado la información de 342 atestados policiales de este tipo de agresiones sexuales registradas en 2010. Posteriormente, se ha llevado a cabo un análisis de correspondencia múltiple y un análisis clúster con las variables del modus operandi para identificar perfiles diferenciales en este tipo de agresiones sexuales. Se han obtenido, de forma coincidente mediante las dos técnicas utilizadas, tres perfiles de agresiones sexuales con víctima desconocida. Al analizar las variables personales de los agresores de dichos perfiles, se han encontrado diferencias en cuanto al país de origen y la edad del autor. Se discutirán las implicaciones que estos resultados puedan tener para la investigación policial en los casos de agresiones sexuales con víctima desconocida

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Alison, L. J., Bennell, C., Mokros, A., y Ormerod, D. (2002). The personality paradox in offender profiling: A theoretical review of the processes involved in deriving back- ground characteristics from crime scene actions. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 8, 115–135.
  • Alison, L. J., Goodwill, A. M., Almond, L., van den Heuvel, C., y Winter, J. (2010). Pragmatic solutions to offender profiling and behavioural investigative advice. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 15, 115–132.
  • Balemba S., Beauregard E., y Mieczkowski T. (2012). To resist or not to resist? The effect of context and crime characteristics on sex offenders’ reaction to victim resistance. Crime and Delinquency, 58, 588–611.
  • Bamford, J., Chou, S., y Browne, K.D. (2016). A systematic review and meta-analysis of the characteristics of multiple perpetrators of sexual offences. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 28, 82-94.
  • Beauregard, E., Rebocho, M.F., y Rossmo, D.K. (2010). Target selection patterns in rape. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 7, 137-152.
  • Beh, E. J., y Lombardo, R. (2014). Correspondence analysis: Theory, practice and new methods. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Bruinsma, F. (1995). Immediate assessment of adolescent sex offenders seen at the police station. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminolo- gy, 39, 306–317.
  • Canter, D. (2000). Offender profiling and psychological differentiation. Journal of Criminal and Legal Psychology, 5, 23–46.
  • Corovic, J., Christianson, S.A. y Bergman, L.R. (2012). From Crime Scene Actions in Stranger Rape to Prediction of Rapist Type: Single-Victim or Serial Rapist? Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 30, 764-781.
  • Deslauriers-Varin, N., y Beauregard, E. (2010). Victim’s routine activities and sex offenders’ target selection scripts: A latent class analysis. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 22(3), 315–342.
  • Deslauriers-Varin, N., y Beauregard, E. (2013). Investigating offending consistency of geographic and environmental factors among serial sex offenders: A comparison of multiple analytical strategies. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 40, 156–179.
  • Douglas, J., Burgess, A., Burgess, A., y Ressler, R. (2006). Crime classification manual (2nd Edition). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Finkelhor, D. (1984). Child sexual abuse: New theory and research. New York: The Free Press.
  • Goodwill, A.M., Stephens, S., Oziel, S., Sharma, S., Allen, J.C., Bowes, N., y Leh- mann, R. (2013). Advancement of criminal profiling methods in Faceted Multidimensional Analysis. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 10, 71-95.
  • Groth, N., Burgess, A., y Holmstrom, L. (1977). Rape, power, anger and sexuality. American Journal of Psychiatry, 134, 1239-1243.
  • Harbers, E., Deslauriers-Varin, N., Beauregard, E., y van der Kemp, J. J. (2012). Testing the behavioural and environmental consistency of serial sex offenders: A signature approach. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 9, 259–273.
  • Hazelwood, R., y Burgess, A. (Eds.) (1987). Practical aspect of rape investigation: A multi-disciplinary approach. New York: Elsevier.
  • Janka, C., Gallasch-Nemitz, F., Biedermann, J., y Dahle, K. P. (2012). The significance of offending behavior for predicting sexual recidivism among sex offenders of various age groups. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 35(3), 159–164.
  • Knight, R. A. (1999). Validation of a typology for rapists. Journal of Interpersonal Vio- lence, 14(3), 303-330.
  • Langevin, R., y Curnoe, S. (2014). Psychological profile of sex offenders using weapons in their crimes. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 20(1), 55-68.
  • Le Roux, B., y Rouanet, H. (2010). Multiple correspondence analysis (Vol. 163). New York, NY: Sage
  • Muller, D.A. (2000). Criminal Profiling: Real Science or Just Wishful Thinking? Homicide Studies, 4 (3), 234-264.
  • Oziel, S., Goodwill, A, y Beauregard, E. (2015). Variability in behavioural consistency across temporal phases in stranger sexual offences. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 30, 176-190.
  • Pedneault, A., Harris, d.A., y Knight, R.A. (2012). Toward a typology of sexual burglary: Latent class findings. Journal of Criminal Justice, 40, 278-284.
  • Planty, M., Langton, L., Krebs, C., Berzofsky, M., y Smiley-McDonald, H. (2013). Female victims of sexual violence, 1994-2010: (NCJ 240655) Washington, DC: U.S. Dpartment of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
  • Polaschek, D.L., Ward, T., y Hudson, S.M. (1997). Rape and rapists: Theory and treatment. Clinical Psychology Review, 17, 117–144.
  • Prentky, R. A. y Knight, R. A. (1991). Identifying critical dimensions for discriminating among rapists. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59(5), 643-661.
  • Rainbow, L. (2008). Taming the beast: The UK approach to the management of behavioral investigative advice. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 23, 90–97.
  • Robertiello, G., y Terry, K.J. (2007). Can we profile sex offenders? A review of sex offender typologies. Aggression and violent behavior, 12, 508-518.
  • Sea, J., Kim, K., y Youngs, D. (2016). Behavioural profiles and offender characteristics across 111 Korean sexual assaults. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 13(1), 3-21.
  • Snook, B., Haines, A., Taylor, P. J., y Bennell, C. (2007). Criminal profiling belief and use: A study of Canadian police officer opinion. Canadian Journal of Police and Security Services, 5(3), 169–179.
  • Ter Beek, M., van den Eshof, P., y Mali, B. (2010). Statistical modelling in the investigation of stranger rape. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 7, 31-47.
  • Van Rijckevorsel, J.L.A., y De Leeuw, J. (1988). Component and Correspondence Analysis: Dimension Reduction by Functional Approximation. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Vettor, S., Woodhams, J. y Beech, A.R. (2013). Offender Profiling: A Review and Critique of the Approaches and Major Assumptions. Journal of Current Issues in Crime, Law and Law Enforcement, 6(4), 353-387.
  • Waterhouse, G.F., Reynolds, A., y Egan, V. (2016). Myths and legends: The reality of rape offences reported to a UK police force. The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 8, 1-10.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet