Primary yield and multitranche structure in securitization issuesExplicative factors. A review

  1. Miguel Á. Peña-Cerezo 1
  2. Arturo Rodríguez-Castellanos 1
  3. Francisco J. Ibáñez-Hernández 1
  1. 1 Universidad del País Vasco, Departamento de Economía Financiera II
Revista:
European Research on Management and Business Economics

ISSN: 2444-8834

Año de publicación: 2016

Volumen: 22

Número: 3

Páginas: 111-116

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.1016/J.IEDEE.2015.08.001 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: European Research on Management and Business Economics

Resumen

The reasons for the strong rise in the securitization phenomenon up until the start of the “subprime crisis” need to be analysed. According to many authors, they mainly stem from its offering the possibility of generating fixed yield securities with the highest rating and a low risk premium, thanks to the issues being structured in differentiated bond series, so that certain series absorb most of the risk, thus facilitating the safer or “senior” tranches having a higher rating. Accordingly, this paper reviews the literature on the factors underlying the generation of differentiated tranches in this type of issues and regarding the determining factors of the yield offered by securitization issues. It concludes that the search for more complete markets, along with the reducing of problems associated to the moral hazard, are the main reasons for the multi-tranche structuring. And given the strong influence of the number of tranches on the yield offered by the issues, the paper likewise concludes that the multitranche structures has been an efficient tool to place securitization issues with more competitive yields.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Agarwal, S., Chang, Y., Yavas, A., Adverse selection in mortgage securitisation. Journal of Financial Economics 105:3 (2012), 640–660.
  • Agostino, M., Mazzuca, M., Why do banks securitise? Evidence from Italy. 2009, Bancaria, 18–38 09-2009.
  • An, X., Deng, D., Gabriel, S.A., Asymmetric information, adverse selection, and the pricing of CMBS. Journal of Financial Economics 100:2 (2011), 304–325.
  • Ashcraft, A.B., Schuermann, T., Understanding the securitization of subprime mortgage credit. 2008, Wharton Financial Institutions Center, Working Paper, 07-43 Available from: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1071189 (09.04.05).
  • Bannier, C.E., Hänsel, D.N., Determinants of European banks’ engagement in loan securitization. Discussion Paper. 2008, Deutsche Bundesbank, Berlin Available from: http://www.bundesbank.de/download/bankenaufsicht/dkp/200810dkp_b_.pdf (09.04.15).
  • BCBS, Report on asset securitisation incentives., 2011, Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, Joint Forum, Bank for International Settlements, Basel Available from: http://www.bis.org/publ/joint26.pdf (09.04.15).
  • Boot, A., Thakor, A., Security design. Journal of Finance 48:4 (1993), 1349–1378.
  • Cardone-Riportella, C., Samaniego-Medina, R., Trujillo-Ponce, A., What drives bank securitisation: The Spanish experience. Journal of Banking and Finance 34:11 (2010), 2639–2651.
  • Childs, P.D., Ott, S.H., Riddiough, T.J., The pricing of multi-class commercial mortgage-backed securities. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 31:4 (1996), 581–603.
  • Cumming, D.J., Schwienbacher, A., McCahery, J.A., Tranching in the syndicated loan market around the World. International Conference of the French Finance Association (AFFI), 2011 Available from: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1836869 (09.04.15).
  • DeMarzo, P., The pooling and tranching of securities: A model of informed intermediation. Review of Financial Studies 18:1 (2005), 1–35.
  • DeMarzo, P., Duffie, D., A liquidity-based model of security design. Econometrica 67:1 (1999), 65–99.
  • Dittrich, F., The credit rating industry: Competition and regulation. (Tesis Doctoral), 2007, Univ. Colonia Available from: papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=991821 (09.04.15).
  • European Commission, Study on asset-backed securities: Impact and use of ABS on SME finance. Final Report for the Enterprise and Industry Directorate-General of the European Commission, 2004, November.
  • Firla-Cuchra, M., Explaining launch spreads on structured bonds. 2005, Oxford University, Working Paper Available from: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm? abstract_id=687800 (09.04.15).
  • Firla-Cuchra, M., Jenkinson, T., Why are securitisation issues tranched? Unpublished Working paper. 2006, January Available from: http://economics.ouls.ox.ac.uk/14295/1/JenkinsonSecuritTranch.pdf (09.04.15).
  • Franke, G., Herrmann, M., Weber, T., Information asymmetries and securitization design. 2007, University of Konstanz, Working Paper Available from: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1107877 (09.04.15).
  • Franke, G., Weber, T., Optimal tranching in CDO-Transactions. 2009, SSRN, Working Paper pp. 1–35. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1342601 (09.04.15).
  • Gaur, V., Seshadri, S., Subrahmanyam, M., Market incompleteness and super value additivity: Implications for securitization. 2004 EFA 2004 Meetings Paper, No. 2714.
  • Gorton, G., Metrick, A., Securitized banking and the run on repo. Journal of Financial Economics 104:3 (2012), 425–451.
  • Gorton, G., Pennacchi, G., Financial intermediaries and liquidity creation. Journal of Finance 45:1 (1990), 49–71.
  • Haselmann, R., Pistor, K., Vig, V., How law affects lending. Review of Financial Studies 23:2 (2010), 519–547.
  • Iacobucci, E.M., Winter, R.A., Asset securitization and asymmetric information. Journal of Legal Studies 35:1 (2005), 161–206.
  • Mitchell, J., Financial intermediation theory and the source of value in structured finance markets. 2004, National Bank of Belgium, Working Paper Available from: www.bis.org/publ/cgfs23mitchell.pdf (09.04.15).
  • Otero, L., Ezcurra, M., Lado, R., Durán, P., The main determinants of subprime securitisation in the Spanish RMBS securities. Applied Economics, 2015, 10.1080/00036846.2015.1071468 (in press).
  • Otero, L., Ezcurra, M., Martorell, O., Mulet, C., Análisis del impacto de la titulación hipotecaria en la estabilidad financiera del sistema bancario español. Revista Española de Financiación y Contabilidad 160 (2013), 513–534.
  • Peña-Cerezo, M.Á., Los bonos de titulización en España: Estructura multitramo y rentabilidad primaria. (Tesis Doctoral), 2014, Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea.
  • Peña-Cerezo, M.Á., Rodríguez-Castellanos, A., Ibáñez-Hernández, F.J., Multirating decision model validation: The relevance of the quality of securitization issues. Journal of Risk Model Validation 7:3 (2013), 35–58.
  • Peña-Cerezo, M.Á., Rodríguez-Castellanos, A., Ibáñez-Hernández, F.J., Determinants of the primary profitability of mortgage-backed securities: The influence of multiframe structures. Innovar: Revista de Ciencias Administrativas y Sociales 24:51 (2014), 127–142.
  • Plantin, G., Tranching. 2004, Tepper School of Business, Working Paper, Pennsylvania.
  • Riddiough, T., Optimal design and governance of asset-backed securities. Journal of Financial Intermediation 6:2 (1997), 121–152.
  • Schaber, A., Combination notes: Market segmentation and equity transfer. Discussion Paper 2008-6. 2008, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München pp. 1–35. Available from: http://epub.ub.uni-muenchen.de/ (09.04.15).
  • Vink, D., Fabozzi, F.J., Non-US asset-backed securities: Spread determinants and over-reliance on credit ratings. 2009, Yale ICF, Working Paper No. 09-13 Available from: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1431994 (09.04.15).
  • Vink, D., Thibeault, A.E., An empirical analysis of asset-backed securitization. 21st Australian Finance and Banking Conference 2008 paper, 2008 Available from: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1014071 (09.04.15).
  • Vink, D., Thibeault, A.E., ABS, MBS and CDO compared: An empirical analysis. Journal of Structured Finance 14:2 (2008), 27–45.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet