Perfil motivacional temprano de estudiantes con dificultades de acceso al léxico y comprensión lectora en educación primaria

  1. Mercader Ruiz, Jessica 1
  2. Badenes-Gasset Presentación, Ana 1
  3. Abellán Roselló, Laura 1
  4. Siegenthaler Hierro, Rebeca 1
  1. 1 Universitat Jaume I
    info

    Universitat Jaume I

    Castelló de la Plana, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02ws1xc11

Aldizkaria:
International Journal of Developmental and Educational Psychology: INFAD. Revista de Psicología

ISSN: 0214-9877

Argitalpen urtea: 2019

Zenbakien izenburua: Psicología de la Educación y Saberes Originarios

Alea: 3

Zenbakia: 1

Orrialdeak: 413-420

Mota: Artikulua

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openSarbide irekia editor

Beste argitalpen batzuk: International Journal of Developmental and Educational Psychology: INFAD. Revista de Psicología

Laburpena

The aim of this retrospective study was to determine the early motivational profile of different groups of students categorized according to their reading performance level in lexicon access and understanding in 2nd year of Primary Education. The initial sample consisted of 208 preschoolers from 5 to 6 years old and their tutors, of whom 179 were evaluated again two years later. In Early Childhood Education, teachers completed the scale of the Preschool Learning Behaviors Scale (PLBS, McDermott, Green, Francis, & Stott, 2000) that evaluates different behaviors related to motivation towards learning (competence-motivation, attentionpersistence and attitude towards learning). Two years later, the Battery for the Evaluation of Reading Processes was administered (PROLEC-R, Cuetos, Rodríguez, Ruano, & Arribas, 2007). Participants were categorized into 4 groups based on their performance in tasks of lexicon access and understanding of PROLEC-R (Cuetos et al., 2007): difficulties in lexicon accessing (DLA, n = 27); difficulties in reading comprehension (DRC, n = 69); difficulties in both domains (DLA + DRC = 32) and average performance (AP, n = 51). The results revealed significant differences between groups in all the variables of motivation towards learning evaluated in Early Childhood Education, with a worse functioning of the groups with difficulties in comparison with the students with average performance. A greater affectation of the DLA + DRC and DLA groups is highlighted in comparison with the students with MRC in the ability to persist before the tasks (attention-persistence). The implications of these findings for research and psychoeducational practice are discussed.

Erreferentzia bibliografikoak

  • Altemeier, L. E., Abbott, R. D., y Berninger, V. W. (2008). Executive functions for reading and writing in typical literacy development and dyslexia. Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology, 30(5), 588-606.
  • Butterfuss, R., y Kendeou, P. (2018). The role of executive functions in reading comprehension. Educational Psychology Review, 30(3), 801-826.
  • Castejón, J. L. (1996). Determinantes del rendimiento académico de los estudiantes y de los centros educativos: modelos y factores. Alicante: Editorial Club Universitario.
  • Cho, E., Lee, M., y Toste, J. R. (2018). Does perceived competence serve as a protective mechanism against performance goals for struggling readers? Path analysis of contextual antecedents and reading outcomes. Learning and Individual Differences, 65, 135-147.
  • Choi, N. (2005). Self-efficacy and selfconcept as predictors of college students’ academic performance. Psychology in the Schools, 42(2), 197-205.
  • Cuetos, F., Rodríguez, B., Ruano, E. y Arribas, D. (2007). PROLEC-R, Batería de Evaluación de los Procesos Lectores, Revisada. (4ª Edición). Madrid: TEA Ediciones.
  • García, E., Jiménez, J. E., González, D. y Jiménez-Suárez, E. (2013). Problemas de comprensión en el alumnado de Educación Primaria y Educación Secundaria Obligatoria: un estudio de prevalencia en español. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 3(2), 113-123.
  • González-Pienda, J. A., Núñez, J. C., Álvarez, L., Roces, C., González-Pumariega, S., González, P., y Bernardo, A. (2003). Adaptabilidad y cohesión familiar, implicación parental en conductas autorregulatorias, autoconcepto del estudiante y rendimiento académico. Psicothema, 15(3), 471-477.
  • Hulme, C., y Snowling, M. J. (2013). Learning to read: What we know and what we need to understand better. Child Development Perspectives, 7, 1–5.
  • Instituto de Evaluación (2015). Marcos y Pruebas de Evaluación de PISA. Volumen I: resultados en Matemáticas, Lectura y Ciencias. Madrid: Ministerio de Educación.
  • Jiménez, J. E., Crespo, P., Rodríguez, C., Díaz, A., García, E. y González, D. (2015). Prevalencia de las dificultades específicas de aprendizaje en la Educación Secundaria Obligatoria. European Journal of Education and Psychology, 3(2), 317-327.
  • Jiménez, J. E., Guzmán, R., Rodríguez, C., y Artiles, C. (2009). Prevalencia de las dificultades específicas de aprendizaje: la dislexia en español. Annals of Psychology, 25(1), 78-85.
  • Kudemir, Y., y Bulut, P. (2018). The Relationship between Elementary School Students’ Reading Comprehension and Reading Motivation. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 6(12), 97-110.
  • Lepola, J., Poskiparta, E., Laakkonen, E., y Niemi, P. (2005). Development of and relationship between phonological and motivational processes and naming speed in predicting Word recog-nition in grade 1. Scientific Studies of Reading, 9, 367-399.
  • Logan, S., Medford, E., y Hughes, N. (2011). The importance of intrinsic motivation for high and low ability readers’ reading comprehension performance. Learning and Individual Differences, 21(1), 124-128.
  • McDermott, P. A., Goldberg, M. M., Watkins, M. W., Stanley, J. L. y Glutting, J. J. (2006). A Nationwide Epidemiologic Modeling Study of LD Risk, Protection, and Unintended Impact. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39(3), 230-251.
  • McDermott, P. A., Green, L. F., Francis, J. M., y Stott, D. H. (2000). PLBS; Preschool Learning Behaviors Scale. Philadelphia: Edumetric & Clinical Science.
  • McDermott, P. A., Mordell, M., y Stoltzfus, J. C. (2001). The organization of student performance in American schools: Discipline, motivation, verbal learning, nonverbal learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(1), 65-76.
  • McDermott, P. A., Rikoon, S. H., y Fantuzzo, J. W. (2014). Tracing children’s approaches to learning through Head Start, kindergarten, and first grade: Different pathways to different outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(1), 200-213.
  • Polychroni, F., Koukoura, K., y Anagnostou, I. (2006). Academic self concept, reading attitudes and approaches to learning of children with dyslexia: do they differ from their peers?. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 21 (4) 415-430.
  • Sideridis, G.D. (2005). Attitudes and motivation of poor and good spellers: Broadening planned behavior theory. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 21, 87-103.
  • Soriano, M. (2017). Dificultades en el aprendizaje. Granada: Editorial GEU.
  • Zisimopoulos, D.A., y Galanaki, E.P. (2009). Academic intrinsic motivation and perceived academic competence in Greek elementary students with and without learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 24 (1), 33-43.
Datuen iturria: Dialnet