La integración vertical, imperfecciones en el mercado intermedio, cualidades de la empresa y cambios en la industria

  1. Díez Vial, Isabel
Aldizkaria:
Esic market

ISSN: 0212-1867

Argitalpen urtea: 2005

Zenbakia: 122

Orrialdeak: 149-178

Mota: Artikulua

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openSarbide irekia editor

Beste argitalpen batzuk: Esic market

Laburpena

En este trabajo se analizan las principales razones para la integración vertical desde cuatro perspectivas: la economía industrial, la nueva economía institucional, la perspectiva basada en los recursos y los modelos dinámicos de integración vertical. Para cada una de ellas, se identifican las hipótesis desarrolladas, las medidas utilizadas y las características de la evidencia empírica existente. A partir de esta revisión, se concluye que las decisiones de integración vertical implican la consideración simultánea de las características de la industria y las diferencias de poder de mercado entre las fases implicadas; los atributos de la transacción entre las etapas y las consecuencias para la eficiencia de la integración vertical; los recursos que la empresa posee y su aplicabilidad a lo largo de la cadena de valor; y, finalmente, la aparición de innovaciones en la industria que alteran la forma de organizar el proceso productivo.

Erreferentzia bibliografikoak

  • ABIRU, M. (1988): “Vertical integration, variable proportions and successive oligopolies” Journal of Industrial Economics, vol. 36 (3), pp. 315-325.
  • ABIRU, M.; NAHATA, B.; RAYCHAUDHAURI, S.; WATERSON, M. (1998): “Equilibrium structures in vertical oligopoly” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, vol. 37 (4), pp. 463-480.
  • ALCHIAN, A.; WOODWARD, S. (1988): “The firm is dead; long live the firm. A review of Oliver E. Williamson’s The economic institutions of capitalism” Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 26 (1), pp. 6 5 7 9 .
  • ANDERSON, E. (1985): “The salesperson as outside agent or employee: a transaction cost analysis” Marketing Science, vol. 4, pp. 234-254.
  • ANDERSON, E.; SCHMITTLEIN, D. (1984): “Integration of sales force: an empirical examination”, RAND Journal of Economics, vol. 15(3), pp. 385-395.
  • ARGYRES, N. (1995), “Technology strategy, governance structure and i n t e rdivisional coordination”, Journal of Economics and Organization, vol. 28 (3), pp. 337-358.
  • ARGYRES, N. (1996): “Evidence on the role of firm capabilities in vertical integration decisions”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 17 (2) pp. 129-150.
  • ARRUÑADA, B. (1998): Teoría contractual de la empresa. Madrid: Marcial Pons Ediciones Jurídicas y Sociales.
  • AZZAM, A. (1996): “Testing the monopsony-inefficiency incentive for backward integration”, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol. 78 (Agosto), pp. 585-590.
  • BAIN, J. (1967), Barriers to new competition. Their characters and conse quences in manufacturing industries. Cambridge: Harvard University Press .
  • BALAKRISHNAN, S.; WERNERFELT, B. (1986): “Technical change, competition and vertical integration”, Strategic Management Journal, vol. 7 (4), pp. 347-359.
  • BARZEL, Y. (1982): “Measurement cost and the organization of markets”, The Journal of Law and Economics, vol. 25 (1), pp. 27-48.
  • BLAIR, R.; KASERMAN, D. (1983): Law and Economics of vertical inte gration, Academy Press, New York.
  • CAMISÓN, C.; GUÍA, J. (2001) “Integración vertical, cooperación interempresarial y resultados: el efecto contingente de la coordinación implícita en un distrito industrial”, C u a d e rnos de Economía y Dirección de la Empresa, vol. 8, pp. 51-76.
  • CAVES, R.; BRADBURD, R. (1988): “The empirical determinants of vertical integration”, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization Vol. 9 (3), pp. 265-279.
  • CHATTERJEE, S. (1991), “Gains in vertical acquisitions and market power: theory and evidence” Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 34 (3), pp. 718-733.
  • CHATTERJEE, S.; SINGH, J. (1999): “Are tradeoffs inherent in diversification moves? A simultaneous model for type of diversification and mode of expansion decisions”, Management Science, vol. 45 (1), pp. 25-41.
  • CHURCH, J.; GANDAL, N. (2000): “Systems competition, vertical merger, and foreclosure”, Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, vol. 9 (1), pp. 25-51.
  • COASE, R. H. (1937): “The nature of the firm”, Economica, vol. 14 (16). [Traducción castellana en Cuervo, A.; Ortigueira, M.; Suárez A. (Eds.) (1979), Lecturas de introducción a al Economía de la Empresa, Ed. Pirámide, Madrid, pp. 15-30.]
  • COLES, J.; HESTERLY, W. (1998): “The impact of firm-specific assets and the interaction of uncertainty: an examination of make or buy decisions in public and private hospitals”, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, vol. 36 (3), pp. 383-409.
  • CONNER, K.; PRAHALAD, C. (1996): “A resource-based theory of the firm: knowledge versus opportunism”, Organization Science, vol. 7 (5), pp. 477-501.
  • CONTIN, I.; HUERTA, E. (2000): “La integración vertical en los sectores energéticos: eficiencia versus poder de mercado”, Gaceta Jurídica de la Unión Europea y de la competencia, vol. 209 (septiembre: octubre), pp. 73-85.
  • DAHLSTROM, R.; NYGAARD, A. (1993): “Market stru c t u re and integration in the Norwegian oil industry”, Omega, Vol. 21 (2), pp. 199-203.
  • D’AVENI, R.; RAVENSCRAFT, D. (1994): “Economies of integration versus bureaucracy costs: Does vertical integration improve performance?”, Academy of Management Journal, vol. 37 (5), pp. 1167-1206.
  • DEMSETZ, H. (1988): “The theory of the firm revisited”, Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, vol. 1, pp. 141-161.
  • ECCLES, R. (1981): “The cuasifirm in the construction industry”, Journal of Economic Behavior and organization, vol. 2, pp. 11-27.
  • ETGAR, M. (1977): “A test of the Stigler theorem”, I n d u s t r i a l Organization Review, vol. 5, pp. 135-137.
  • FOSS, N. (1993): “Theories of the firm: contractual and competence perspectives”, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, vol. 3, pp. 127-144.
  • FOSS, N. (1996): “More critical comments on knowledge-based theories of the firm”, Organization Science, vol. 7 (5), pp. 519-523.
  • FUENTE, J.; GARCÍA, M. (1999), “Una aproximación contingente a la estrategia empresarial de la integración vertical”, Revista Europea de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa, vol. 8, pp. 127-158.
  • FUENTE, J.; HERNANGÓMEZ, J. (1990), “La estrategia de integración vertical de la empresa española. 1984-1987”, Esic-Market, vol. 70, pp. 111-125.
  • GARCÍA VÁZQUEZ, J. (1996), “Integración vertical, poder de negociación y competitividad empresarial”, Esic-Market, 91, pp. 165-187.
  • GLOBERMAN, S.; SCHWINDT, R. (1986): “The organization of vert i c a l l y related transactions in the canadian forest products industries”, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Vol. 7 (2) pp. 199-212.
  • GONZÁLEZ-DÍAZ, M.; ARRUÑADA, B.; FERNÁNDEZ, A. (2000): “Causes of subcontranting: evidence from panel data on construction firms”, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, vol. 42 (2), pp. 167-187.
  • G R A N T, R. (1996): “Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm ” , Strategic Management Journ a l, vol. 17 (Winter Special Issue), pp. 1 0 9 1 2 2 .
  • GREENHUT, M.; OHTA, H. (1976): “Related market conditions and interindustrial mergers”, American Economic Review, vol. 66 (3), pp. 267-277.
  • HAMILTON, J.; MQASQAS, I. (1996): “Double marginalization and vertical integration: new lessons from extension of the classic case”, Southern Economic Journal, vol. 62 (3), pp. 567-584.
  • HARRIGAN, K. (1985): “Vertical integration and corporate strategy”, Academy of Management journal, vol. 28 (4), pp. 914-925.
  • HARRIGAN, K. (1986): “Matching Ve rtical Integration Strategies to Competitive Conditions”, Strategic Management Journ a l, Vol. 17(6), pp. 5 3 5 5 5 5 .
  • HENNART, J. (1988): “Upstream Vertical Integration in the Aluminum and Tin Industries: A Comparative Study of the Choice Between Market and Intrafirm Coordination”, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, vol. 9, pp. 281-299.
  • HOLMSTRÖM, B.; MILGROM, P. (1994): “The firm as an incentive system”, The American Economic Review, vol. 84 (4), pp. 972-991.
  • HOSKISSON, R. (1987), “Multidivisional Structure and Performance: Contingency of Diversification Strategy”, Academy of Management Journal, vol. 30 (4), pp. 625-644.
  • JOHN, G.; WEITZ, B.A. (1988) : “Forward integration into distribution. An empirical test of transaction cost analysis”, Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, vol. 4, pp. 337-355.
  • KLEIN, B.; CRAWFORD, R.; ALCHIAN, A. (1978): “Vertical integration, appropriable rents, and the competitive contracting process”, Journal of Law and Economics, vol. 21 (2), pp. 297-326.
  • KLEIN, S.; FRAZIER, G.; ROTH, V. (1990): “A transaction cost analysis model of channel integration in international markets”, Journal of Marketing Research, vol. 27, pp. 196-208.
  • KLEIN, B.; MURPHY, K. (1997), “Vertical integration as a self-enforcing contractual arrangement”, American Economic Review, Vol. 87 (2), pp. 415-420.
  • K R A F F, M. (1999): “An empirical investigation of the antecedents of sales force control system”, J o u rnal of Marketing, vol. 63 (julio), pp. 1 2 0 1 3 4 .
  • KRATTTENMAKER, T.; SALOP, S. (1986): “Anticompetitive exclusion: raising rival’s costs to achieve power over price”, Yale Law Journal, vol. 96, pp. 209-293.
  • LANGLOIS, R. (1992a):“Transaction-cost economics in real time”, Industrial and corporate change, vol. 1(1), pp. 99-127.
  • LANGLOIS, R. (1992b): “External economies and economic progress: the case of the microcomputer industry”, Business History Review, vol. 66 (primavera), pp. 1-50.
  • LANGLOIS, R. (1995): “Capabilities and coherence in firms and markets” en Resource based and evolutionary theories of the firm. Toward a synthesis Montgomery, C. (Ed). Dordrech y Boston: Kluwer academic Publishers, pp. 71-100.
  • LANGLOIS, R.; ROBERTSON, P. (1989), “Explaining vertical integration: lessons form the American automobile industry”, Journal of Economic History, vol. 49, pp. 361-375.
  • LANGLOIS, R.; ROBERTSON, P. (1995): Firm, Markets And Economic Change: A Dynamic Theory Of Business Institutions. Routledge, Nueva York.
  • LEIBLEIN, M.; REUER, J.; DALSACE, F. (2002), “Do make or buy decisions m a t t e r ?: The influence of organizational governance on technological performance” Strategic Management Journ a l, vol. 23, pp. 817-833.
  • LEMELIN, A. (1982): “Relatedness in the patterns of interindustry diversification”, The Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 54 (4), pp. 646-657.
  • LEVY, D. (1984): “Testing Stigler’s interpretation of the division of labor is limited by the extent of the market”, Journal of industrial Economics, vol. 32 (Marzo), pp. 377-389.
  • LEVY, D. (1985): “The transactions cost approach to vertical integration: an empirical examination”, The Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 67 (3), pp. 438-445.
  • LIEBELER, W. (1976): “Integration and competition” en Vertical integra tion in the oil industry. MITCHELL, E. (Ed.), Washintong D.C.: American Enterprise Institute, cap. 1, pp. 5-34.
  • LIEBERMAN, M. (1991): “Determinants of vertical integration: an empirical test”, The Journal of Industrial Economics, vol. 39 (5), pp. 451-466.
  • LOPÉZ-BAYÓN, S.; VENTURA, J.; GONZALEZ-DÍAZ, M. (2002), “La formalización de los acuerdos de subcontratación: El caso de la industria electrónica española”, Investigaciones Económicas, vol. 26 (1), enero, pp. 87-111.
  • LUBATKIN, M.; CHATTERJEE, S. (1994), “Extending modern portfolio theory into the domain of corporate diversification: does it apply?”, Academy of Management Journal, vol. 37 (1), pp. 109-136.
  • LUSTGARTEN, S. (1975), “The impact of buyer concentration in manufacturing industries”, The Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 57 (2), pp. 125-132.
  • MACDONALD, J. (1985): “R&D and the directions of diversification”, The Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 67 (4), pp. 583-590.
  • MACMILLAN, I.; HAMBRICK, D.; PENNINGS J. (1986): “Uncert a i n t y deduction and the threat of supplier retaliation: two views of the back ward integration decision”, Organization Studies, vol. 7, pp. 2 6 3 2 7 8 .
  • MADHOK, A. (2002), “Reassessing the fundamentals and beyond: Ronald Coase, the transaction cost and resource-based theories of the f i rm an the institutional stru c t u re of production”, S t r a t e g i c Management Journal, vol. 23, pp. 535-550.
  • MAHONEY, J. (1992):“The Choice of Organizational Form: Vertical Financial Ownership Versus Other Methods of Vertical Integration”, Strategic Management Journal, vol. 13 (8) pp. 559-584.
  • MAHONEY, J.; PANDIAN, R. (1992): “The resource-based view within the conversation of strategic management”, Strategic Management Journal, vol. 13, pp. 363-380.
  • MALLELA, P.; NAHATA, B. (1980): “Theory of vertical control with variable proportions”, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 88 (5), pp. 1009-1025.
  • MARIOTTI, S.; CAINARCA, G. (1986):“The Evolution of Transaction Governance in the Textile-Clothing Industry”, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Vol. 7 (4), p. 351-3.
  • MARKIDES, C.; WILLIAMSON, P. (1994): “Related diversification, core competencies and corporate performance”, Strategic Management Journal, vol. 15 (special issue, summer), pp. 149-165.
  • MARTIN, S. (1986), “Causes and effects of vertical integration”, Applied Economics, vol. 18 (7), pp. 737-755.
  • MASTEN, S. (1984): “The organization of production: evidence fro m the aerospace industry”, Journal of Law and Economics, vol. 27, pp. 4 0 3 4 1 8 .
  • MASTEN, S.; MEEHAN, J.; SNYDER, E. (1989): “Vertical integration in the US auto industry: a note on the influence of transaction specific assets”, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, vol. 12, pp. 265-273.
  • MASTEN, S.; MEEHAN, J.; SNYDER, E. (1991): “The costs of organization”, Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, vol. 7, pp. 1-25.
  • MITCHELL, E. (1976): “Capital cost savings of vertical integration” en Ve rtical integration in the oil industry. MITCHELL, E. (Ed.), Washintong D.C.: American Enterprise Institute, cap. 13, pp. 7 3 1 0 3 .
  • MONTEVERDE, K. (1995): “Technical dialog as an incentive for vertical integration in the semiconductor industry”, Management Science, Vol. 41 (10), pp. 1624-1638.
  • MONTEVERDE, K.; TEESE, D. (1982a): “Supplier switching costs and vertical integration in the automobile industry”, Bell Journal of Economics, vol. 13 (Spring), pp. 206-213.
  • MONTEVERDE, K.; TEESE, D. (1982b): “Appropriable rents and quasi-vertical integration” The Journal of law and Economics, vol. 25 (2), pp. 321-328.
  • MURIS, T.; SCHEFFMAN, D.; SPILLER, P. (1992): “Strategy and transaction costs: the organization of distribution in the carbonated soft drink industry”, Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, vol. 1, pp. 85-128
  • MURRAY, J.; KOTABE, M. (1999): “Sourcing strategies of W.S. service companies: a modified transaction-cost analysis”, Strategic Management Journal, vol. 20 (9), pp. 791-809.
  • ORDOVER, J.; SALONER, G.; SALOP, S. (1990): “Equilibrium vertical foreclosure”, The American Economic Review, vol. 80 (1), pp. 127-142.
  • PERRY, M. (1989): “Vertical integration: determinants and effects” en Handbook of industrial organization R. Schmalensee; Willig R. (Eds), Elsevier Science Publishers BV, Harper & Row, Amsterdan, vol. 1, pp. 185-255.
  • POPPO, L. (1995): “Influence activities and strategic coordination: Two distinctions of internal and external markets”, Management Science Vol. 41 (12), pp.1845-1859.
  • POPPO, L.; ZENGER, T. (1998): “Testing alternative theory of the firm: transaction cost, knowledge-based, and measurement explanations for make or buy decisions in information services”, Strategic Management Journal, vol. 19 (9), pp. 853-877.
  • RICHARDSON, G. (1972): “The organization of the industry”, The Economic Journal, vol. 82 (Septiembre), pp. 883-896.
  • RINDFLEISCH, A.; HEIDE, J. (1997): “Transaction cost analysis: past, present and future applications”, Journal of Marketing, vol. 61 (octubre), pp. 30-54.
  • ROBERTSON, P.; LANGLOIS, R. (1995): “Innovation, networks, and vertical integration”, Research Policy, Vol. 24 (4), pp. 543-562.
  • ROBERTSON, T.; GATIGNON, H. (1998): “Technology development mode: a transaction cost conceptualization”, Strategic Management Journal, vol. 19 (6), pp. 515-531.
  • SALOP, S.; SCHEFFMAN, D. (1983): “Raising rivals` costs”, American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, vol. 73 (2), pp. 267-271.
  • SCHERER, F. M.; ROSS, D. (1990): Industrial Market Stru c t u re and economic perf o rm a n c e. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 3.ª Edición .
  • SHELANSKI, H.; KLEIN, P. (1995): “Empirical research in transaction cost economics: a review and assessment”, Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, vol. 11 (2), pp. 335-361.
  • SILVER, M. (1984): Enterprise and the scope o the firm. Martin R o b e rtson, Londres [Traducción castellana en Silver, M. (1996) Innovación y alcance de la empresa. El papel de la integración vertical. Coll, S. (traductor), Ariel, Barcelona]
  • SPILLER, P. (1985), “On vertical mergers”, Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, vol. 1, pp. 285-312.
  • STIGLER, G. (1951): “The division of labor is limited by the extent of the market”, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 59 (3), pp. 185-193.
  • STUCKEY, J.; WHITE, D. (1993), “When and when not to vertically integrate”, Sloan Management Review Vol. 34 (3), pp. 71-83.
  • SUTCLIFFE, K.; ZAHEER, A.(1998):“Uncertainty in the transaction environment: An empirical test”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 19 (1), pp. 1-23.
  • TEECE, D. (1976): “Vertical integration in the U.S. industry” en Vertical integration in the oil industry. MITCHELL, E.J. (Ed.), American Enterprise Institute: Washintong D.C. cap. 4, pp. 105-189.
  • TEECE, D. (1982): “Towards an economic theory for multiproduct firm” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, vol. 3, pp. 39-63.
  • TEECE, D. (1986): “Profiting from technological innovation: implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy”, Research Policy, vol. 15 (6), pp. 285-305.
  • TEECE, D. (1996): “When is virtual virtuous? Organizing for innovation”, Harvard Business Review, vol. 74 (1), pp. 65-73.
  • TUCKER, I.; WILDER, R. (1977):“Trends in vertical integration in the U.S. manufacturing sector”, The Journal of Industrial Economics, vol. 26 (1), pp. 81-94.
  • WALKER, G.; WEBER, D. (1987):“Supplier competition, uncertainty and make-or-buy decision”, Academy of Management Journal, vol. 30, pp. 589-596.
  • WALKER, G.; WEBER, D. (1984): “A transaction cost approach to make-or-buy decision”, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 29 (3), pp. 373-391.
  • WARREN -BOULTON, F. (1974): “Vertical control with variable proportions”, The Journal of Political Economy, vol. 82 (4), pp. 783-802.
  • WATERSON, M. (1993): “Vertical integration and vertical restraints”, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, vol. 9 (2), pp. 41-57.
  • WILLIAMSON, O. E. (1985): The economic institutions of capitalism. Free Press, Nueva York.
  • WILLIAMSON, O. E. (1991): “Comparative economic organization: the analysis of discrete structural alternatives”, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 36 (2), pp. 269-296.
  • YOUNG, A. (1928): “Increasing returns and economic progress”, The Economic Journal, vol. 38 (diciembre), pp. 527-542.
  • ZAHEER, A.; VENKATRAMAN, N. (1994): “Determinants of electronic integration in the insurance industry: An empirical test”, Management Science, vol. 40 (5) pp. 549-566.
Datuen iturria: Dialnet