Anàlisi de la seqüenciació d'activitats en materials de phrasal verbs: Una proposta didàctica basada en el model PC

Referencias bibliográficas

• Anderson, J., & Fincham, J. (1994). Acquisition of Procedural skills from examples. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 1322-1340.
• Anderson, J., & Schunn, C. (2000) Implications of the ACT-R Learning Theory: No Magic Bullets. In R. Glaser (Ed.) Volume 5: Educational Design and Cognitive Science. Advances in Instructional Psychology (pp. 1-34) London: Routledge.
• Brumfit, C. J. (1979). ‘Communicative’ language teaching: an educational perspective. In C. J. Brumfit & K. Johnson (Eds.), The communicative approach to language teaching (pp. 183-191). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Criado, R. (2008). Patterns of activity sequencing in the teaching of English as a foreign language and their effects on learning: a quasi-experimental study. Dissertation. University of Murcia, Spain. 4th July 2016. http://www.tesisenred.net/handle/10803/10817;jsessionid=65E- 2D3E5211A2BD18FA7FD8C2D08DE22
• Criado, R. (2009). The “Communicative Processes-Based Model of Activity Sequencing” (CPM): A cognitively and pedagogically sound alternative to the P-P-P sequencing Model in ELT. Odisea: Revista de Estudios Ingleses, 10, 33-56.
• Criado, R. (2010). The impact of activity sequencing on the difference between ELT methods: A critical analysis of sample units. Porta Linguarum, 14(1), 7-28.
• Criado, R. (2013). A critical review of the Presentation-Practice-Production Model (PPP) in Foreign Language Teaching. In R. Monroy (Ed.), Homenaje a Francisco Gutiérrez Díez (pp. 97-115). Murcia: Edit.um.
• Dainty, P., & Kent, P. (1991). PVs in context. Macmillan.
• DeKeyser, R. (1998). “Beyond focus on form: cognitive perspectives on learning and practicing second language grammar”. In C. Doughty and J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 42-63). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• DeKeyser, R. (2009). Cognitive-psychological processes in second language learning. In M. Long & C. Doughty (Eds.), Handbook of second language teaching (pp. 119-138). Oxford: Blackwell.
• DeKeyser, R. (2015). Skill Acquisition Theory. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition (2nd ed., pp. 94-112). New York: Routledge.
• DeKeyser, R., & Criado, R. (2013). Automatization, skill acquisition, and practice in second language acquisition. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics (pp. 1-5). London: Blackwell.
• Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Gibbons, J. (1989). Instructional cycles. English Teaching Forum, 27(3), 6-11.
• Howatt, A. (1984). A history of English language teaching. Oxford: OUP.
• Johnson, K. (1982). Communicative syllabus design and methodology. Oxford: Pergamon Press Ltd.
• Johnson, K. (1994). Teaching declarative and procedural knowledge. In M. Bygate, A. Tonkin & E. Williams (Eds.), Grammar and the language teacher (pp. 121-131). London: Prentice Hall.
• Johnson, K. (1996). Language teaching and skill learning. Oxford: Blackwell.
• Lewis, M. (1993). The Lexical Approach. Hove, England: LTP Teacher Training.
• Lewis, M. (1996). Implications of a lexical view of language. In D. Willis & J. Willis (Eds.), Challenge and change in language teaching (pp. 10-16). Oxford: Heinemann.
• Littlewood, W. (1981). Communicative language teaching. An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Maftoon, P., & Sarem, S. (2012). A critical look at the Presentation, Practice, Production (PPP) approach: challenges and promises for ELT. BRAIN. Broad Research in Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience, 3(4), 31-36.
• Marks, L., & Devlin, E. (2015). English world student’s book ESO 4. Chittenden: Burlington.
• McCarthy, M., & O’Dell, F. (2004). English PVs in use. Ernst Klett Sprachen. procedural Model”. Cognition, 92, 231-270.
• Roberts, J. T. (2004). The communicative approach to language teaching: The king is dead! Long live the king!. International Journal of English Studies, 4(1), 1-37.
• Salaberry, M. R. (2018). Declarative versus procedural knowledge. The TESOL Encyclopedia of English language teaching, 1-7.
• Sánchez, A. (1993). Hacia un método integral en la enseñanza de idiomas. Madrid: SGEL, S. A.
• Sánchez, A. (2001). “Sequencing of Activities and Motivation”. In V. Codina Espurz & E. Alcón Soler (Eds), Language learning in the foreign language classroom (pp. 116-132). Castellón: Universidad Jaume I.
• Sánchez, A. (2004). Enseñanza y aprendizaje en la clase de idiomas. Madrid: SGEL, S. A.
• Scrivener, J. (1994). PPP and after. The Teacher Trainer, 8(1), 15-16.
• Sharwood-Smith, M. (2008) ‘Input enhancement in instructed SLA’. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15(2), pp. 165–179. doi: 10.1017/S0272263100011943.
• Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Sharwood Smith, M. (1993). Input enhancement in treatment SLA: theoretical bases. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 165-179.
• Spada, N. (2007). Communicative language teaching. In C. Davison & J. Cummins (Eds.), International handbook of English language teaching (pp. 271-288). Springer, Boston, MA.
• Thim, S. (2012). PVs. The English verb-particle construction and its history. Berlin, Germany: Walter DeGruyter.
• Tomlinson, B. (2009). Principles of effective materials development. In N. Harwood (Ed.), English language teaching materials: theory and practice (pp. 81-108). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Tomlinson, B. (2011). Introduction: Principles and procedures of materials development. In B. Tomlinson (Ed.), Materials Development in Language Teaching. (pp. 1-32), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Towell, R., & Hawkins, R. D. (1994). Approaches to second language acquisition. Multilingual matters.
• Ullman, M. T. (2004). Contributions of Memory Circuits to Language: The declarative/procedural model. Cognition, 92(1-2), 231-270.
• Ullman, M. T. (2016). The declarative/procedural model: A neurobiological model of language learning, knowledge, and use. In Neurobiology of language (pp. 953-968). Academic Press
• Ullman, M. T., Estabrooke, I. V., Seinhaure, K., Brovetto, C., Pancheva, R. Ozawa, K., et al. (2002). Sex differences in the neurocognition of language. [Abstract]. Brain and Language, 83, 141-143.
• White, L. (1987). Against comprehensible input: the input hypothesis and the development of second-language competence. Applied Linguistics, 8(2), 95-110.
• Wilkins, D. A. (1974). Second-language learning and teaching. London: Edward Arnold.
• Willis, J. (1996). A framework for task-based learning. Essex: Addison Wesley Longman.
• Wong, W., & Van Patten, B. (2003). The best English: A claim for the superiority of received standard English. Society for Pure English, 39, 603-621.
• Woodward, T. (1993). Changing the basis of pre-service TEFL training in the U.K. IATEFL TT SIG Newsletter, 13, 3-5.